Re: Re: QA Bug remind : to clarify

David, while I do really appreciate your enthusiasm, and work on this, just a short note for next time: a) try and discuss it on pear-qa. -- it makes it far less personal. "I'm just doing what pear-qa agreed apon - read the thread" b) ignore the negative feedback, just say thanks, and we'll do it better next time. (dont justify yourself.. - I know it's difficult). ---- And hopefully next time we will have a single email on pear-dev, listing all the open/assigned bugs. how is anyone (?helgi) getting on with that? Regards Alan David Costa wrote:

Hello Anders On Jul 12, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Anders Betnér wrote:

This is the first time I speak up on the pear-lists, the recent rants from some immature coding prima donnas forced me to.

Thanks for taking your time to speak up, really appreciated.

As a php developer I really appreciate the hard work the QA team is doing to keep the widespread flora of pear packages to conform to some common rules. I think that their work can lift pear from useful to great.

once again thank you very much. The newly formed QA team is far from perfect and whilst constructive criticism is always welcome and is the only way to develop our efforts, destructive comments came as a surprise to me. It is sad to see some skilled developers to limit their views to some egocentric sights.

It really surprises me that some developers resist a change in that direction. My hope is that their view will not prevail in the pear community. While I don't share these individuals' views I am very thankful for the hours they spend making their packages.

I have the same appreciation and respect for every PEAR developer, regardless of our personal views. Regards David Costa

-- Can you help out? Need Consulting Services or Know of a Job? http://www.akbkhome.com