Re: Forking PEAR

Greg Beaver wrote:

Heino, I for one think these are great ideas. There are some huge technical hurdles that will be argued will prevent this because nobody will want to do the work :) #1: pearweb needs a complete rewrite in order to support channels #2: pearweb needs a complete rewrite in order to support channels #3: you probably know what I'm going to say :) However, I have done some work on a modular server that would support the xml-rpc side of pearweb and would also support a simple html forms interface. The look of pearweb could be written into another driver that would allow this to work for separate channels. However, this is a LONG ways off from being finished, let along stable.

I don't have a lot of time, but I'd be happy to help out with this task. Maybe we should chat off list or in smaller groups to figure out where the problems are and what I/we can do to help. Hans