Re: suggested syntax for channels

From: Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:36:32 +0000
Subject: Re: suggested syntax for channels
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-33497@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sep 20, 2004, at 1:28 PM, Greg Beaver wrote:
Richard York wrote:
IMO, If you're going to use a URI-style syntax you should keep the amphersand. Changing to a slash seems more expensive from a usability point of view.
Thanks for the input, your opinion has been noted. I will wait to see how others feel, and this can be changed easily at any time before the first beta release :)
I agree with Richard here. Not to be an ass, but if it's going to be URIs then it should be URIs. The /key=val/ notation is a working option, obviously, but it's not "expected" when everything else looks like a URI. But that's just me. -- Paul M. Jones Savant: the simple alternative to Smarty for PHP. http://phpsavant.com/ DB_Table: build RDBMS tables and XHTML forms in one PHP class. http://wiki.ciaweb.net/yawiki/index.php?area=DB_Table Yawiki: a collaborative online documentation system. http://yawiki.com/ Yawp: a single-file foundation for PHP applications. http://phpyawp.com/

« previous php.pear.dev (#33497) next »