Re: [Fwd: [PHP-DEV] PHP Module for reading/writing Palmtop.PDB files..]

Joao Prado Maia wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Martin Jansen wrote: > > > >Even C extensions are supposed to comply with the coding standards ? > > > > Yup. > > > > >I feel kind of unsure about this one, as eventually we will have several > > >extensions moving from 'php4/ext' to 'pear/PECL'. > > > > The extensions, that move from php4/ext to PEAR, will go to pear/PECL. > > > > Extension, that will come in the future and that are compliant to > > the coding standards, will go to pear directly. > > > > It's like you ignored my reasoning for saying the above. Can you explain > how is PEAR going to enforce the coding standards on the C extension > authors ? From what you are saying, we should probably send an email to > the imagick extension author asking him to PEARify his function names ;) > > Anyway, what's going to be here ? I vote for leaving the PECL alone in > regards of the coding standards, it's just impossible to try to enforce > something like that. That is the whole point of PECL: a place where extensions that don't follow the PEAR naming scheme can live. - Stig