Re: [Fwd: [PHP-DEV] PHP Module for reading/writing Palmtop .PDB files..]

On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Martin Jansen wrote: > >Even C extensions are supposed to comply with the coding standards ? > > Yup. > > >I feel kind of unsure about this one, as eventually we will have several > >extensions moving from 'php4/ext' to 'pear/PECL'. > > The extensions, that move from php4/ext to PEAR, will go to pear/PECL. > > Extension, that will come in the future and that are compliant to > the coding standards, will go to pear directly. > It's like you ignored my reasoning for saying the above. Can you explain how is PEAR going to enforce the coding standards on the C extension authors ? From what you are saying, we should probably send an email to the imagick extension author asking him to PEARify his function names ;) Anyway, what's going to be here ? I vote for leaving the PECL alone in regards of the coding standards, it's just impossible to try to enforce something like that. Cheers, Joao -- João Prado Maia <jpm@phpbrasil.com> http://phpbrasil.com - php com um jeitinho brasileiro -- Precisando de consultoria em desenvolvimento para a Internet ? Impleo.net - http://impleo.net/?lang=br