Re: HTTP_Client or Net_Socket bug?

From: Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:25:41 +0000
Subject: Re: HTTP_Client or Net_Socket bug?
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-34414@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:14:52 -0500, Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org> wrote: > Quoting Andrew Nagy <asnagy@webitecture.org>: > > > Yup, according to netcraft it is a Win2k with IIS 5. I am using the > > latest version of Net_Socket, unless the code in CVS has been updated? > > Right. This commit fixed the problem: > > http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/pear/Net_Socket/Socket.php?r1=1.16&r2=1.17&ty=h > > The latest release is 1.0.2, though, many months ago. The reason is that I > haven't made a new release since this: > > http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/pear/Net_Socket/Socket.php?r1=1.9&r2=1.10&ty=h > > It fixes many problems for folks, but technically by current PEAR BC rules it > can't be released, at least under the same name. But releasing it as > Net_Socket2 is a nightmare and a half for all the packages that use > Net_Socket. > So we're at a stalemate. > > Do I remember correctly that progress has been made on the impact of extending > PEAR? Or only on including it? So it breaks BC by no longer extending PEAR? Argh... You can add stubs for all/most of the functions and hope that's ok for the BC police... I wonder is anyone is actually *using* any of the PEAR functionality in Net_Socket.... > > > It must be an issue with IIS5 because I am connecting to other sites > > that use SSL and do not cause the warning. > > Correct. > -- Justin Patrin

« previous php.pear.dev (#34414) next »