Re[2]: [PEAR-DEV] HTTP_Client or Net_Socket bug?

Hello Chuck, >> Essentially the current PEAR works around the memory management issues. >> A destructor is only registered for those packages that define a >> destructor. Also the shutdown method is only registered once, at the >> time PEAR finds the first destructor. So the performance impact should >> become really low. Especially if you are using several PEAR packages and >> once you return the first error object the impact is fairly limited. >> Also expectError() is quite a nice feature to be able to override the >> global error handler. Although its black magic for most people :-( >> >> So to conclude there are less reasons to get into the fuss of breaking >> BC over not extending PEAR anymore. CH> Okay. I've re-committed the extension of PEAR.php. If a few folks will test, CH> I'll release 1.0.3. I'm using Net_Socket CVS and haven't found any new bugs so far. And old ones are gone. I think you should file a release ASAP. =) t --