Re: HTTP_Client or Net_Socket bug?

From: Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:47:07 +0000
Subject: Re: HTTP_Client or Net_Socket bug?
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-34427@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Quoting Lukas Smith <lsmith@php.net>:
Essentially the current PEAR works around the memory management issues. A destructor is only registered for those packages that define a destructor. Also the shutdown method is only registered once, at the time PEAR finds the first destructor. So the performance impact should become really low. Especially if you are using several PEAR packages and once you return the first error object the impact is fairly limited. Also expectError() is quite a nice feature to be able to override the global error handler. Although its black magic for most people :-( So to conclude there are less reasons to get into the fuss of breaking BC over not extending PEAR anymore.
Okay. I've re-committed the extension of PEAR.php. If a few folks will test, I'll release 1.0.3. -chuck -- "But she goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy." - John Quincy Adams

« previous php.pear.dev (#34427) next »