[PEPr] +1 for RFC::VersionNaming

Laurent Laville (http://pear.php.net/user/farell) has voted +1 on the proposal for RFC::VersionNaming. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=65 Vote information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=65&handle=farell This vote is conditional. The condition is: I like it; it's enough clear only for point below : You wrote : "- General discussion on pear-group indicated that no complete agreement could be reached on the 2 controversial points (RC/package state suffixes.), as a result, the conclusion is that they should be proposed as seperate RFC's." Does it means we have to vote without this particular but essential note (in my point of view: due to current conflit with case html_css) ? And should it be a limit in state suffix naming ? For example: x.y.zRCn with n = 1,2,3 what is the max ? x.y.zbetan with n = 1,2,3, what is the max ? Sorry if i've missed an important thread before ! -- Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net