Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for RFC::VersionNaming
| From: | Helgi Þormar | Date: | Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:53:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for RFC::VersionNaming | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-34578@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 11:33, Arnaud Limbourg wrote:
> > People should know about [PackageName]-[state]. I put this in the FAQ
> > not too long ago.
> >
> > preferred_state is absolutely necessary for upgrade-all.
>
> I also think it doesn't make much sense to do pear install myapackage-beta.
>
> I don't want to have to do that. It adds unnecessary complications.
What do you then want to do ? always having to change the preferred
state ? or even just have not preffered state thingie and people can
just download all packages regardless of their state ?
I'm sorry but both scenarios look bad in my eyes :-)
Did you have something else in mind ?
- Helgi