Re: UPS Package

On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 23:29:42 +0100, bertrand Gugger <bertrand@toggg.com> wrote: > Justin Patrin wrote: > > >On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 21:51:20 +0100, bertrand Gugger <bertrand@toggg.com> wrote: > > > > > >>Helgi Þormar wrote: > >> > >> > >>>On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 20:04, bertrand Gugger wrote: > >>> > >>> > >[snip] > > > > > >>>to often > >>> > "too" was ment, so I intended to make a joke underneath > > >>>people have a hard time > >>>understanding what your saying, like now. > >>> > >>> > >>I must apology, it's too often, it's language too. (at best, take it as > >>brainstorming) > >>Please, understand that people whithout any peace of karma can have that > >>very hard. > >> > >> > Yes, justin, it was "piece" of kama to be understood. > > > > >Most of that is not understandable. > > > OK, I must try to shorten and be more readable. > BTW, could someone post a definition of "karma" on QA list? In PEAR terms karma is simply permission. "PEAR-dev karma" is short for "Do you have the permissions of a full PEAR developer"? Karma's actual def is much different. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma Basically it's a measure of how good/bad you have been. Slashdot's karma system is similar to the real def in that you get good karma for getting good scores (modded up) on your comments and bad karma for bad scores. > > For this very UPS thread: > Short, parcel service should be generalized, it's my only aim. This I can agree with. There should be a generalized minimal API which can be used for all (most) of the services. > > I got a poor english/american education, > that's bad, this thread was too long, that's bad too. > > I apology to puzzle here, whole pear is puzzling. > Thanks for answers, regards. Just read through and revise your responses before you send them to make them easier to understand. > -- > bertrand Gugger (toggg) > -- Justin Patrin