Re: Re[2]: [PEAR-DEV] Re: go-pear. Was:Re[2]: [PEAR-DEV] XML_RPC

On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:29:00 +0200, anatoly techtonik <techtonik@php.net> wrote: > Hello Pierre-Alain, > > From Thursday, December 9, 2004, 2:12:21 PM, you wrote: > > >> Even if you place an '@'... (which I have missed in my patch), > > PAJ> btw, where is your patch? can you please attach it again using a > PAJ> .txt extension only? > > Well, I see that none of my patches got here. =/ Now I can send you > only cummulative. To see what had been changed follow this thread. > Is it possible to add .patch into the list of allowed extensions? It's not extensions, it's the content-type (at least, that's what they say). Make sure the content-type is text/plain. > > > > >> think about the error message the user will get (I'm using PHP > >> 4.3.9) > >> > >> <?php > >> $host = 'zzzz'; > >> $fp = @fsockopen($host, 80, $errno, $errstr); > >> if (!$fp) { > >> print("\nconnect to '$host' failed: $errstr ($errno)\n"); > >> } > >> ?> > >> > >> >connect to 'zzzz' failed: The operation completed successfully. > >> >(0) > >> Rather confusing if you ask me. > > PAJ> Makes me think about MS style messages :-). > > PAJ> Failed to see where it comes from (the completed part). > > Did you get that message? > >> >connect to 'zzzz' failed: The operation completed successfully. > If it so then disable @ and read PHP warning to see where does it > come from. That's gethostbyaddr() that failed and not fsockopen() > fsockopen() returns "i'm ok" > > t > -- -- Justin Patrin