Re: Version naming
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Thu, 09 Dec 2004 22:48:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Version naming | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-34990@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Anatoly Techtonik wrote:
Hello pear-dev, It seems, that I've missed all the fun with version naming proposal. Now I see some interesting status convention - CVS commit in one package.xml fromyou have come late twice .. there is already a new rfc that went through and that would hopefully soon make it into some sort of document: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=65 regards, Lukas<version>1.2.0-dev</version>to<version>1.2.0dev</version>Can smb. quickly enlighten me on the matter, why joined-up writing style was chosen? I thought x.x.x is version and -letters suffix is package status? In natural language people often divide logical concepts by spaces to words, by liparagraphs and so on. Why to havepreg_match("|\W+|i", $version); preg_match("|\w+|i", $version);instead ofexplode("-", $version);to get package version and it's status?