Re: Re: Version naming
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:36:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Version naming | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-35052@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Anatoly Techtonik wrote:
Hello Lukas,I dont know honestly .. there were some comments in that direction a month or so ago on this list. Try searching for that in the archive. regards, LukasLS> currently the state is not part of the .tgz name. LS> Adding the state was one of the intentions of the original RFC, but LS> people didnt like having it in the version name and some people dont LS> like it being in the .tgz name. Why not to have status information in .tgz? Do tell me it is inconvenient to know what status has downloaded package? Esp. if there are two or more different versions downloaded into one directory.Also will PEAR redistribute alpha and beta packages in .tgz format? What is file naming convention in this case?I don't understand the question.