Re[2]: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Version naming
| From: | anatoly techtonik | Date: | Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:30:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re[2]: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Version naming | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-35048@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Lukas,
>>> Also will PEAR redistribute alpha and beta packages in .tgz format?
>>> What is file naming convention in this case?
>> I don't understand the question.
LS> currently the state is not part of the .tgz name.
LS> Adding the state was one of the intentions of the original RFC, but
LS> people didnt like having it in the version name and some people dont
LS> like it being in the .tgz name.
Why not to have status information in .tgz?
Do tell me it is inconvenient to know what status has downloaded
package? Esp. if there are two or more different versions downloaded
into one directory.
t
--