RE: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR/Mail in php 4.1.0 release broken?
| From: | Christian Stocker | Date: | Mon, 17 Dec 2001 15:23:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR/Mail in php 4.1.0 release broken? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-3514@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Martin Jansen wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:10:39 +0100 (CET), Christian Stocker wrote:
>
> >speaking of documentation. PECL/imagick in PECL has also some docbook
> >documentation, which maybe could fit into the pear manual. what do you
> >think?
>
> There is no must for you to write documentation for your extension
> in Docbook since it's no core extension (whose documentation has to
> be written in Docbook), but if you want to do so that's nice. Have
> a look at CVS/peardoc/en/packages/ to see how other packages have
> been documented.
it's already written in docbook :) (see pear/PECL/imagick/xml/imagick.xml)
My question was more, if i should/am allowed to add the
imagick-documentation to peardoc.
chregu