Re: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_UPS

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:42:08 +0100, spam@batz.org <spam@batz.org> wrote: > Of course it is specific, but not more or less than Services_Ebay for example. > Services_Shipping could depend on it. > i am willing to modify it the way it is needed to get it to work with sucha package then. > but i wanna support more functionalities of UPS then needed for a shipping package. > finally i wanna support everything UPS offers. True, and you do have a good point. Services_Shipping *can* use Services_UPS in its backend. It will just have to take a third class to work as the UPS driver for Services_Shipping that passes calls to Services_UPS. Unless, of course, you work closely with the Services_Shipping leads to make sure that your API will work directly with their package. > > Services_USPS is still in the draft list of the proposals, but that would be another one > that could be used of Services_Shipping then. > regards Tim > > On 5 Jan 2005 21:48:19 -0000, Justin Patrin wrote: > > >Justin Patrin (http://pear.php.net/user/justinpatrin) has commented on the proposal for Web > >Services::Services_UPS. > > >Comment: > > >Great idea, but this is a pretty specific package. There was discussion a > >month or 2 ago about a unified shipping package. Check the archives and > >e-mail the people who were working on it to see if they have anything > >done. > > >Proposal information: > >http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=187 > -- Justin Patrin