[PEPr] Comment on Images::Image_Canvas

From: Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:48:11 +0000
Subject: [PEPr] Comment on Images::Image_Canvas
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-38812@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Jesper Veggerby (http://pear.php.net/user/nosey) has commented on the proposal for Images::Image_Canvas. Comment: Toby: If changing write() and done() means a +1 from you, then it's fine with me :) Regarding your wish for arrays as parameters, I see the best/only use for them when having need for overloads. Especially when having to document these arrays I find them a pain, but also having to write the extra (seemingly uncessary) array(..) bothers me, and even worse if it's "hashed". But of course it offers greater flexibility, but at the high price of "clearness-of-code" (you can't just take the header of the method and understand the parameters) However (after this looong speak against :)), in many methods (factory, done, setFont, etc), I already employ the use of associated arrays, so for the sake of consistency in the package I agree on your point and I will change them. /Jesper Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=212 -- Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net

« previous php.pear.dev (#38812) next »