Re: Naming convensions

On 8/3/05 11:23 AM Pacific Time, Joe Stump (joe@joestump.net) wrote: > I would concur with the others that variables *should* be humpBack > since functions are and, from what I can tell, it appears to be a > defacto standard of sorts. I think we need something better than a "de facto standard of sorts" ... It's either in the Coding Standards, or it's not, period. There's nothing in the documentation that discusses variable naming conventions, only function/method names. Personally, I don't make the leap that just because functions are namedLikeThis that variables should be also. In fact, as I said last week, I feel exactly the opposite -- and until the day that the Coding Standards are updated to specifically address variable names, I will not consider my choice to name_variables_like_this to be incorrect, invalid, or not recommended. -Clay -- Killersoft.com