Re: [PEPr] Call for votes on Tools and Utilities::CodeGen_MySQL_UDF
| From: | Justin Patrin | Date: | Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:09:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Call for votes on Tools and Utilities::CodeGen_MySQL_UDF | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-39673@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 8/31/05, Helgi Þormar <helgi@trance.is> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 23:30 +0200, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> > Justin Patrin wrote:
> > > On 31 Aug 2005 20:49:29 -0000, Hartmut Holzgraefe <hholzgra@php.net> wrote:
> > >> Hartmut Holzgraefe (http://pear.php.net/user/hholzgra) has initiated the call for
> > >> votes on Tools and Utilities::CodeGen_MySQL_UDF.
> > >>
> > >> Please review the proposal and give your vote here:
> > >>
> > >> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=290
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ummm...what happened to the Proposal stage? I haven't seen any of the
> > > proposal e-mails for any of these CodeGen packages.
> >
> > i wrote a draft, changed its state to proposal, waited for a bit more
> > than the required time, then moved on to voting
> >
> > do i need to take extra steps besides changing state from Draft
> > to Proposal? If so -> why?
>
> I my self see nothing wrong with what you did, but usually preferred
> that people announce they will call for votes after X days, allowing for
> some discussion or something ...
>
> My advice to you so you get less noise like this next time, move to
> proposal, wait 3-4 days, email about call for votes (say, that it will
> start after 7 days) and then do cfv. or skip the first waiting and
> announce it right away, that way there shouldn't be much noise.
>
> Anyway just bare this in mind, it isn't mission critical or anything,
> specially in cases were people know the proposers from past packages/ext
> or such.
>
Yes, never mind me. I just seem to be missing all sorts of things these days.
--
Justin Patrin