Re: [PEPr] Call for votes on Tools and Utilities::CodeGen_MySQL_UDF

From: Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:09:09 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] Call for votes on Tools and Utilities::CodeGen_MySQL_UDF
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-39673@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 8/31/05, Helgi Þormar <helgi@trance.is> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 23:30 +0200, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: > > Justin Patrin wrote: > > > On 31 Aug 2005 20:49:29 -0000, Hartmut Holzgraefe <hholzgra@php.net> wrote: > > >> Hartmut Holzgraefe (http://pear.php.net/user/hholzgra) has initiated the call for > > >> votes on Tools and Utilities::CodeGen_MySQL_UDF. > > >> > > >> Please review the proposal and give your vote here: > > >> > > >> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=290 > > >> > > > > > > Ummm...what happened to the Proposal stage? I haven't seen any of the > > > proposal e-mails for any of these CodeGen packages. > > > > i wrote a draft, changed its state to proposal, waited for a bit more > > than the required time, then moved on to voting > > > > do i need to take extra steps besides changing state from Draft > > to Proposal? If so -> why? > > I my self see nothing wrong with what you did, but usually preferred > that people announce they will call for votes after X days, allowing for > some discussion or something ... > > My advice to you so you get less noise like this next time, move to > proposal, wait 3-4 days, email about call for votes (say, that it will > start after 7 days) and then do cfv. or skip the first waiting and > announce it right away, that way there shouldn't be much noise. > > Anyway just bare this in mind, it isn't mission critical or anything, > specially in cases were people know the proposers from past packages/ext > or such. > Yes, never mind me. I just seem to be missing all sorts of things these days. -- Justin Patrin

« previous php.pear.dev (#39673) next »