Re: [PEPr] Call for votes on PEAR::PEAR_PackageUpdate

From: Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:31:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] Call for votes on PEAR::PEAR_PackageUpdate
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-41909@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Bonjour, Scott Mattocks wrote:
Scott Mattocks (http://pear.php.net/user/scottmattocks) has initiated the call for votes on PEAR::PEAR_PackageUpdate. Please review the proposal and give your vote here: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=369 Sorry being very late on your proposal.
From a cursory review , I would say it's high quality code. I just wonder why the factory does not give back a forced reference, but I guess it's PHP5 related. My wonder is: what does that gives better than PEAR itself or the PEAR_Frontend_xxx things ? I saw the user confirmation, it's a very nice thing I ask since ever, even tunable , better. I fear code duplications / contradictions. Note that I'm not opposed to the package, but just wonder what's really new , I guess I miss something. -- toggg

« previous php.pear.dev (#41909) next »