Re: [PEPr] Comment on PEAR::PEAR_PackageUpdate

Here are some answers for Scott, but also Christian Weiske and Justin Patrin who asked two days ago why i've deleted my proposal about a frontend for PEAR_PackageFileManager2. I've talked with Scott about a common solution for my web frontend and its own Gtk2 frontend : a backend as for PPU. This class is almost finished, and before to propose it officially to the PEAR community with a revisited copy of my old web frontend, i'll test it with Scott. BTW i open NOW a call for comment about a CLI frontend for future PEAR_PackageFileManager2. Do you think its possible ? does anyone have already ideas ? All feedback are welcome !!! Scott, i'll send to you a preview of PFM backend with a PEAR_ErrorStack implementation, i've used. Something very similar to your PPU need. I've also used a contribution (not official) part of code of StackThunk package from Ian Eure. I hope it won't be a problem if i use part of code: especially PEAR_Error repackaging. And of course give a credit to Ian. Laurent Laville PS: Greg Beaver, if you read this post, i'm still waiting a answer about my help request from PFM package 2.0 and install conditions. Scott Mattocks a écrit :

Thanks for the comments Justin, Justin Patrin wrote:

I would suggest using PEAR_ErrorStack instead of implementing your own error stack in the class.

I am thoroughly confused by the docs for PEAR_ErrorStack but I will try to read them over again and update the package.