Re: New class Net_Geo
| From: | Edin Kadribasic | Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:36:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New class Net_Geo | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4305@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 23:14, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:54:45 +0100
> > "Edin Kadribasic" <edink@proventum.net> wrote:
> > > I think that that we agreed that c extensions in precl should adhere
> > to the
> > > php coding standard.
> > I hope stig's "vision of PEAR"-paper could clear this, but from my
> > unterstanding (and the PEAR documentation), PEAR is devided into three
> > parts: The Core, base classes, pear coding standard. The Extended part:
> > coding standard compliant PHP/C packages. PECL, repository for php
> > extensions written in C that do not follow the pear coding standard such
> > as extension that are moved from php4/ext.
> > So if Jan's (hi ;) extension follows the pear coding standard, it
> > belongs to the extended part, otherwise to PECL.
>
> You got it.
Just to make sure I understand it correctly: there will be PHP extensions
written in C that reside in PEAR *outside* PECL?
Edin