Re: New class Net_Geo

On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 00:36, Edin Kadribasic wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 23:14, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > Hi, > > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:54:45 +0100 > > > "Edin Kadribasic" <edink@proventum.net> wrote: > > > > I think that that we agreed that c extensions in precl should adhere > > > to the > > > > php coding standard. > > > I hope stig's "vision of PEAR"-paper could clear this, but from my > > > unterstanding (and the PEAR documentation), PEAR is devided into three > > > parts: The Core, base classes, pear coding standard. The Extended part: > > > coding standard compliant PHP/C packages. PECL, repository for php > > > extensions written in C that do not follow the pear coding standard such > > > as extension that are moved from php4/ext. > > > So if Jan's (hi ;) extension follows the pear coding standard, it > > > belongs to the extended part, otherwise to PECL. > > > > You got it. > > Just to make sure I understand it correctly: there will be PHP extensions > written in C that reside in PEAR *outside* PECL? Yes. The difference is that the ones outside PECL have to follow PEAR's naming scheme. - Stig