Re: Regrouping PEAR

Myabe even more or less, we just have to make sure that the members are actually working but not only working, they should (imho) be able to work together as a team in order to make pear superior. I personally think that 5-6 is a good number but if we have 11 people that can work as a team I don't see where the problem is. $0.02 On 9/27/06, Clay Loveless <clay@killersoft.com> wrote:

On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Scott Mattocks wrote: The Administrative Document for the PEAR Group says that only PEAR Group members can change the members of the group. Can the Group members please take it amongst themselves to fill these positions or defer to an RFC that will repopulate the group? I think Scott brings up a very good point. One of the things that I did notice in the reviewing the PEAR Group materials this morning (after reading Scott's email) is that the group size is a "maximum of nine" ... but nothing dictates that the max be maintained. Seems like it would be worth at least discussing whether or not nine members is truly the most efficient number, or if seven or five would be more efficient. Just a thought. Thanks for bringing this up, Scott! -Clay -- Killersoft.com -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-- David Coallier, Founder & Software Architect, Agora Production (http://agoraproduction.com) 51.42.06.70.18