Re: PEAR a way forward
| From: | Alexey Borzov | Date: | Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:57:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR a way forward | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-44369@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Scott Mattocks wrote:
QA team already had rotation mechanisms in place. And it was supposedly comprised of people who wanted to do the job (since these people volunteered for QA team in the first place). So, Scott, please enlighten me on two points: 1) Why did the previous QA team fail? 2) Why will the QA team you propose succeed?We already had a couple groups with cool sounding names who did almost nothing. What exactly makes you think that it will be different this time?The fact that the groups get regularly renewed with people that want to do the job. The current groups are stagnant and most of them have no real interest in doing what the group was designed to do.
Plus, I want to provide specific points of accountability for the groups. If you don't do your job, you get the boot and someone who will do it takes over.Who exactly will be giving this "boot"?