Re: [PEPr] +1 for Networking::Net_MAC
| From: | Andrew Teixeira | Date: | Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:40:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] +1 for Networking::Net_MAC | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-45201@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I have updated the code as suggested. Please take a look again as I
believe I have fixed all the errors you pointed out. I hadn't used
exceptions before today, so I was a little unclear on how they
functioned. Thanks for the help.
On 13 Dec 2006 19:51:54 -0000, Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:
Greg Beaver (http://pear.php.net/user/cellog) has voted +1 on the proposal for Networking::Net_MAC. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=454 Vote information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=454&handle=cellog This vote is conditional. The condition is: This code:try {if (!isset($options['vendorcol'])) {throw new PEAR_Exception('No vendor column name given in options');}} catch (PEAR_Exception $e) {throw $e;}is redundant and unnecessary. Just do:if (!isset($options['vendorcol'])) {throw new PEAR_Exception('No vendor column name given in options');}In addition, you should not be using the raw PEAR_Exception. It should have either a code, or be customized. You can do this with a 1-liner class Net_MAC_Exception extends PEAR_Exception {} The last issue is critical - you should not be using PEAR_Exception raw. The first one is cosmetic but will also affect performance so you should do it :). -- Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net