Re: Re: CVS Access Method
| From: | Bertrand Mansion | Date: | Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:04:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: CVS Access Method | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-45576@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le 4 févr. 07 à 10:39, Anant Narayanan a écrit :
If you know Git and Darcs, you should really give Mercurial a try :) -- Bertrand Mansion Mamasam Work : http://www.mamasam.com Blog : http://golgote.freeflux.netI also don't find there is enough added value in SVN to switch from CVS. In many cases, SVN is worse than CVS. It won't fit what we need in PEAR IMO. If we were to change, other solutions should also be considered and more modern solutions like a distributed version control system should be tested. I have tested Mercurial and it's great. I think BZR is nice too. I heard that DARCS is excellent. SVN, just like CVS, are things from the past. Did you ever try a distributed version control system before ?I've used both git and darcs before; and needless to say that the convenience of distributed version control is unbeatable. So yes, I for one, would love it if we actually use one of these modern VCS: Either git, darcs or bzr.