Re: Re: CVS Access Method

Hi, Am Montag, den 05.02.2007, 10:38 -0600 schrieb Gregory Beaver: > Bertrand Mansion wrote: > > PEAR is really different from other projects like Mozilla or even PHP > > itself, which are compact. I wonder if it wouldn't be better to setup > > one repository per project/package instead of one repository for > > everything in PEAR ? Using a distributed system, it would be very easy > > to manage. If PEAR were a framework, it would make sense to have only > > one repository. But packages are not tied together and that's the idea > > of PEAR. Then why would they share the same changesets and revision > > numbers. Furthermore, with multiple repository, it becomes easier to > > manage partial checkouts, permissions, workload, bandwidth, etc :) > > That's just an idea. > Hi, > > This actually sounds reasonable to me as an idea. It would greatly > simplify checking out, and ease bandwidth issues in some cases. > However, it would make it more difficult to check out the entire PEAR > project, wouldn't it? You could always create one central repository with svn-externals [1] links to all the other reporsitories. Kore [1] http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ch07s03.html

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil signature.asc