Re: Rejected packages
| From: | David Coallier | Date: | Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:32:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Rejected packages | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-46295@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I believe this is something we should decide after the elections, it's
a pear-group to discuss about it.
But if there would be no re-structuration, I would say that it makes sense.
On 4/19/07, Arnaud Limbourg <arnaud@limbourg.com> wrote:
Bertrand Mansion wrote: Hi, There are 2-3 packages which have recently been rejected because not enough people voted. This is holiday season for some I guess. I think it should be added in the PEAR constitution that members of the PEAR Group (or PEAR QA) must vote, in order to make sure there is enough votes when the proposal reaches end date. Otherwise the developer will feel disappointed by the lack of interest for his proposal (even if sometimes the proposals touch very specialized subjects). I suggest the rejected proposals get one more week. Makes sense. Arnaud. -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php-- David Coallier, Founder & Software Architect, Agora Production (http://agoraproduction.com) 51.42.06.70.18