Re: Rejected packages

alan Knowles wrote: > I'm tempted to agree on this one, If Greg want's to get into his feature > mode and produce a league table for pepr voter's it would be quite > interesting as well...... :) Not sure I know what a "league table" is here, but let me know and I might. > While I'm sceptical that the collective's idea is going to work, It > would be nice to be proved wrong. I sure hope it works, but the constitution can be easily amended if it does fail. > PS. While I have to thank Greg for suggesting that I stand for PEAR > Group again, I'm sitting it out this year, as I'm quite happy to see > some fresh blood in there, and I can still make the occasional comment > on pear-dev if I really need to ;). Sorry to hear it, thanks for the years of service, maybe you'll reconsider next spring? > PPS. Is there some way we can get each of the candidate's > "vision/agenda" tagged into the voting system, so that you can see it > when you decide to vote.. - Some of them look really good, and it's nice > to see that much enthusiasm This is a good idea. I will grab the URLs I see in Josh Eichorn's blog post where he aggregated folks' positions. Not everyone has done this yet, but for those who have, it will be there. Note that once the election starts, I can't edit it without directly modding the database, something I am not willing to do under any circumstances on the off chance I blow something up by mistake. Greg