Re: Rejected packages

Bertrand Mansion wrote: > Hi, > > There are 2-3 packages which have recently been rejected because not > enough people voted. This is holiday season for some I guess. > I think it should be added in the PEAR constitution that members of the > PEAR Group (or PEAR QA) must vote, in order to make sure there is enough > votes when the proposal reaches end date. Otherwise the developer will > feel disappointed by the lack of interest for his proposal (even if > sometimes the proposals touch very specialized subjects). > > I suggest the rejected proposals get one more week. Hi, I would suggest we ditch PEAR-wide PEPr and instead allow collectives to make decisions about whether a related package should be accepted. This will make it a lot more attractive to propose packages, and the folks who actually have some active knowledge of the package's innards will be making the acceptance decision. However, if this does not interest the new pear group (and they will ultimately make the final decision on any changes), I am in favor of adding a week. Greg