[PEPr] +1 for Encryption::Crypt_DiffieHellman

From: Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:54:47 +0000
Subject: [PEPr] +1 for Encryption::Crypt_DiffieHellman
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-47147@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Adam Harvey (http://pear.php.net/user/aharvey) has voted +1 on the proposal for Encryption::Crypt_DiffieHellman. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=496 Vote information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=496&handle=aharvey This vote is conditional. The condition is: I don't have the cryptographic background to assess the implementation of the algorithm itself, but I did run the unit tests. I'm +1 assuming a couple of minor issues I ran across while testing are fixed: - Line 380 of DiffieHellman.php refers to Crypt_DiffieHellman_BigInteger and not Crypt_DiffieHellman_Math_BigInteger, which I presume it should. - The Crypt_DiffieHellmanTest test fails at present due to $aliceSecretKey and $bobSecretKey being instances of Crypt_DiffieHellman. Appending a call to getSharedSecretKey() in lines 29 and 30 of tests/DiffieHellmanTest.php seems to deal with that. Beyond that, I'd wonder if the Math classes could be split off into a separate package (Math_BigInteger2?), since they're generally applicable, but my vote's not conditional on that happening. -- Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net

« previous php.pear.dev (#47147) next »