Re: Why change require_once? A brief explanation of motives
| From: | Alexey Borzov | Date: | Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:57:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Why change require_once? A brief explanation of motives | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-47567@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
OK, how will the usage examples and unit tests access this single __autoload() implementation?The usage examples and unit tests need to load the package classes, you know, as well as dependencies. How are they going to find them?All packages in PEAR will be able to work with a single __autoload() implementation. So I do not see the issue.