Re: Why change require_once? A brief explanation of motives

till wrote: > On 7/17/07, Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org> wrote: >> Philippe Jausions wrote: >> >> > 1) Would relying on autoload have any impact on developers/users using >> > an IDE? By that I mean, autocompletion integrated API doc and so forth. >> > (Anybody with experience on the topic?) >> >> AFAIK IDE's just index the code on a per directory basis. I do not think >> that they follow require_once etc. I will shoot out an email to >> ActiveState and Zend guys on this. > > Yes, they do. > > Specifically Zend Studio allows you to edit a "php.ini" located in the > programs directory to allow "resolving". Then you can also add all > class trees (e.g. PEAR, Solar and Zend Framework) to your project by > linking the directory and Zend Studio will resolve all require_once > calls and enable auto complete/suggest. > > I have no idea about eclipse - but I'd say it's very similar. > > Cheers, > Till So, would removing *_once calls in the code still allow the IDE to resolve classes? It's not really a PEAR2 issue per-se, but would need to be documented if it has an impact. Is someone with Zend Studio able to do a quick test? and let us know? -Philippe