Re: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_TinyURL
| From: | Joe Stump | Date: | Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:04:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_TinyURL | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-47973@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
1) What about those of us who like to instantiate everything? :-) Would a Services_TinyURL::singleton/getInstance() be appropriate, or am I the only one that would want to instantiate this object?I can't think of a strong argument to do so. Can you? I meant for it to be exceptionally lightweight (much like TinyURL itself). I can be persuaded though as I don't feel strongly on the subject. Anyone else feel it should be instantiable (is that a word?)?
2) I think there's a typo on the pattern of the first preg_match() of lookup(). "[a-z0-91]" - the "1" is redundant, no?Good catch.
3) Why use preg_match_all() at the end of lookup()?A lack of sleep and coffee? :) Good catch! Thanks! - --Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFG5qBxh0MUGpYY9OQRAgxuAJwPP7XeE2Vv6b6bTX0sBVi0dhH36wCgsder tOY/fsbab74ZWKtn7VyGY8g= =7tjp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----