Re: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_TinyURL

From: Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:23:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_TinyURL
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-47984@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 9/11/07, Joe Stump <joe@joestump.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > No notice, no E_STRICT. Seems to be fine. Hence, Travis can extend the > > class for unittests without making the code any more complicated. ;-) > > Since when does PHP5 allow you to call static methods non-statically > without throwing a notice? This is news to me. I think the "public static" part is important. If you just did "static", it would be different. From what I understand "public static" is not a static method that is "callable" outside of "self" (hope my point makes it across). I think this was what you were thinking though? But that's just an uneducated guess. ;-) Btw, I am on 5.2.3. Till

« previous php.pear.dev (#47984) next »