Re: Re: WARNING : PEAR_PackageFileManager2 and PHP5 (realpath function)
| From: | Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson | Date: | Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:57:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: WARNING : PEAR_PackageFileManager2 and PHP5 (realpath function) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-48457@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 11/14/07, Laurent Laville <pear@laurent-laville.org> wrote:
>
> Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson a écrit :
> > On Nov 13, 2007 6:45 PM, Laurent Laville <pear@laurent-laville.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Carsten Wiedmann a écrit :
> >>> Laurent Laville schrieb:
> >>>
> >>>> Now I realize that the problem came from PHP 5 itself and realpath()
> >>>> function.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have not yet tested it under *Nix, but only on Windows platform
> (CLI
> >>>> or Apache module)
> >>>>
> >>>> Realpath of a directory gave me a trailing "\" with PHP 5.2.4 and
> even
> >>>> now with PHP 5.2.5, but not with PHP 4.4.7
> >>> Just to inform you:
> >>> Since the current snaps of PHP5.2/5.3/6.0 (Windows), this have been
> >>> changed back to the normal behaviour:
> >>> Resulting paths have no trailing slash.
> >>>
> >>> BTW curious:
> >>> This changed behaviour was only in realpath(), but not in
> >>> DirectoryIterator::getRealPath().
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Carsten
> >> Hi Carsten,
> >>
> >> Thanks to take me aware of this situation. Probably a link for everyone
> >> to clarify bug (special thanks to author)
> >>
> >> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=43248
> >>
> >
> > I had this problem about 2 weeks ago or so when I was trying to package
> > pearweb and I found the patch Lorenzo made and informed Tim he'd need to
> > make a release asap and yet I still haven't gotten a response from him,
> does
> > anyone know if he's just too busy or what ?
> > Might be advisable that Greg does this release just so that windows
> users
> > with 5.2.4 can actually package things without having to do some
> patching or
> > I can take it upon my self to do it as a QA member.
> >
> > Regards
> > Helgi
> >
>
> Sorry to Helgi and Carsten if you received twice this mail
> Re-post original version I sent from my office with a webmail (poor
> webmail ;-)
>
> So on original post I written :
> -------------
>
> I proposed to be active lead again to do a release to solve this
> problem, and I got only one answer from Greg Beaver (on this list).
>
> I've tried to contact Tim wia pear web mail (but not yet received a
> response).
>
> I don't know if I must still wait agreement of Tim (actual and only
> active leader).
>
> I don't see any answer about such situation in PEAR doc (manual). Perharps
>
> QA team or PEAR group can reply to this question.
>
> How long can we wait to become an active leader ?
> - 1. zero day (agreement of current leaders not requires),
> - 2. with for a response of active leaders
> - 3. others ...
you have to wait 2 weeks or 1 month, which I kinda did already but it was
unofficial, tho I could be wrong, read through
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60
it's been a while for
me so I might be misremembering my own document :)
But well I'd say 2 or 3 are the only options that will apply, 1 is just
plain rude :P
- Helgi