Re: Re: WARNING : PEAR_PackageFileManager2 and PHP5 (realpath function)

From: Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:57:40 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: WARNING : PEAR_PackageFileManager2 and PHP5 (realpath function)
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-48457@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 11/14/07, Laurent Laville <pear@laurent-laville.org> wrote: > > Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson a écrit : > > On Nov 13, 2007 6:45 PM, Laurent Laville <pear@laurent-laville.org> > wrote: > > > >> Carsten Wiedmann a écrit : > >>> Laurent Laville schrieb: > >>> > >>>> Now I realize that the problem came from PHP 5 itself and realpath() > >>>> function. > >>>> > >>>> I have not yet tested it under *Nix, but only on Windows platform > (CLI > >>>> or Apache module) > >>>> > >>>> Realpath of a directory gave me a trailing "\" with PHP 5.2.4 and > even > >>>> now with PHP 5.2.5, but not with PHP 4.4.7 > >>> Just to inform you: > >>> Since the current snaps of PHP5.2/5.3/6.0 (Windows), this have been > >>> changed back to the normal behaviour: > >>> Resulting paths have no trailing slash. > >>> > >>> BTW curious: > >>> This changed behaviour was only in realpath(), but not in > >>> DirectoryIterator::getRealPath(). > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Carsten > >> Hi Carsten, > >> > >> Thanks to take me aware of this situation. Probably a link for everyone > >> to clarify bug (special thanks to author) > >> > >> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=43248 > >> > > > > I had this problem about 2 weeks ago or so when I was trying to package > > pearweb and I found the patch Lorenzo made and informed Tim he'd need to > > make a release asap and yet I still haven't gotten a response from him, > does > > anyone know if he's just too busy or what ? > > Might be advisable that Greg does this release just so that windows > users > > with 5.2.4 can actually package things without having to do some > patching or > > I can take it upon my self to do it as a QA member. > > > > Regards > > Helgi > > > > Sorry to Helgi and Carsten if you received twice this mail > Re-post original version I sent from my office with a webmail (poor > webmail ;-) > > So on original post I written : > ------------- > > I proposed to be active lead again to do a release to solve this > problem, and I got only one answer from Greg Beaver (on this list). > > I've tried to contact Tim wia pear web mail (but not yet received a > response). > > I don't know if I must still wait agreement of Tim (actual and only > active leader). > > I don't see any answer about such situation in PEAR doc (manual). Perharps > > QA team or PEAR group can reply to this question. > > How long can we wait to become an active leader ? > - 1. zero day (agreement of current leaders not requires), > - 2. with for a response of active leaders > - 3. others ... you have to wait 2 weeks or 1 month, which I kinda did already but it was unofficial, tho I could be wrong, read through http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60 it's been a while for me so I might be misremembering my own document :) But well I'd say 2 or 3 are the only options that will apply, 1 is just plain rude :P - Helgi

« previous php.pear.dev (#48457) next »