Re: IT[X] unstable - why?
| From: | Valerio Santinelli | Date: | Wed, 06 Mar 2002 08:04:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: IT[X] unstable - why? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4903@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I don't know why it's still called unstable, but I have used IT[X] for a big
project there and it worked flawlessly.
--
Valerio Santinelli
Digisoft Multimedia s.r.l.
http://www.digisoft-multimedia.it/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Haertl" <mhaertl@emiga.de>
To: <pear-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:18 PM
Subject: [PEAR-DEV] IT[X] unstable - why?
> Hi,
>
> on http://pear.php.net/manual/en/packages.templates.itx.php
> there's
> stated that IntegratedTemplateExtension is only a wrapper class for
> PHPLib Template and that it shouldn't be used in new projects.
>
> But if you look at the source, you'll find that IT[X] inherits most of
> IT's methods and extends IT only with some methods for including blocks
> from a file. So why should it not be classified as stable as IT?
>
> I'm using IT[X] in my projects and hasn't had any problem so far. If
> there are some known problems i'd like to hear about them. Shouldn't be
> to hard to make it stable then.
>
> We shouldn't be too unobtrusive about some of the PEAR classes if we
> want PEAR to become more adopted - they are often more usable than their
> authors might think :).
>
> Michael
>
>
> --
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
>