Re: IT[X] unstable - why?
| From: | Stig S. Bakken | Date: | Wed, 06 Mar 2002 22:24:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: IT[X] unstable - why? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4926@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 15:08, Ulf Wendel wrote:
>
>
> Michael Haertl wrote:
>
> > Personally i've missed exactly the blockfile feature in IT. So is it
> > really such a performance killer in PHP to use an extended class? If
> > so, maybe one could merge the IT[X] functionality into IT. I really
> > can't see any other point why IT[X] should be less usable than IT.
>
>
> The performance killer of todays PHP is:
>
> include("code.php");
>
> Source compilation is slow compared to script runtime. Having a
> include("tons_of_code_only_partly_required.php") is a bad idea.
Are you sure this is true in more recent versions? Last time I talked
to Z/A about this I was told the difference should be negligible now.
- Stig