Re: IT[X] unstable - why?
| From: | Martin Jansen | Date: | Wed, 06 Mar 2002 18:02:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: IT[X] unstable - why? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4925@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 14:37:39 +0100, Alexander Merz wrote:
>The problem with ITX is:
>a) no maintainer
>b) ITX is *not* 100% PHPLib template compatible, but a lot people believe this
>c) We have IT and Template_PHPLib, both are working fine. ITX is a bastard, a
>thing between, which have never go to the PEAR repository. ITX sets a layer
>over a layer -> slower then every other template solution in PEAR. There is no
>real reason to use it.
Telling people not to use IT[X], even if it is in PEAR, does not make
much sense to me. Removing it from PEAR does not make sense to me either,
since there seem to be a lot of people that are happily using it.
I vote for clearly pointing out the disadvantages in the manual and
finding a new maintainer for IT[X] (Michael?).
- Martin
--
Martin Jansen, <mail@martin-jansen.de>
http://www.martin-jansen.de/