Re: [PEPr] Comment on Images::JpegMarkerReader
| From: | Christian Schmidt | Date: | Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:43:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on Images::JpegMarkerReader | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-50279@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
David Sanders wrote:
Christian Schmidt wrote:I agree :-) That's why I treat abbreviations as regular words in the camel case used in my own code (e.g. Foo_Url, Foo_Http_Request etc.). This also solves the question whether an acronym like SOAP is considered a word or an abbreviation. But generally I think that all PEAR packages should follow the same convention. ChristianWhat is the naming convention WRT abbreviations in names? Most packages write them in all caps, e.g. HTTP_Request, XML_Query2XML, Net_FTP, Net_LDAP etc. In order to follow this convention, shouldn't the class be named Image_JPEGMarkerReader?You know I'm not so sure about this. It makes it hard to separate words when using bumpy caps.