Re: Re: Keeping CVS? was - Re: [PEAR-DEV] CVS 2 SVN (Re: [PEAR-DEV] candidatesfor PEAR Group: why should we vote for you? Tell us your plans and
yourhistory)

From: Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:59:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Keeping CVS? was - Re: [PEAR-DEV] CVS 2 SVN (Re: [PEAR-DEV] candidatesfor PEAR Group: why should we vote for you? Tell us your plans and
yourhistory)
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-52034@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
+1 for github My first PEAR package was made available at GitHub, and I think it was a good thing in the proposal proccess. It was easier for other devs to review the code and suggest fixes/improvements/etc. This package is the living proof of what Joe said: "No more manual patch submissions: just fork mine, commit, and I'll merge" Till had some suggestions, he forked the repo, committed the changes and asked for a merge. Done! 2009/6/23 till <klimpong@gmail.com>: > Woah, sweet. On all levels. ;-) > > I can also add a huge +1 for Github. Recently met Scott and PJ and > they do remarkable things. > > Generally, I think it would be a good idea to setup a PEAR account for > external repositories such as Google Code, SF and Github. Just so > someone has access in case the lead goes AWOL. > > Till > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Joe Stump<joe@joestump.net> wrote: >> Huge +1 from me. I've moved all of my PEAR projects to GitHub. Git+GitHub >> make managing FOSS projects SO much easier. No more manual patch >> submissions: just fork mine, commit, and I'll merge. So easy. >> >> If we do happen to go this route we might want to consider mandating a >> central PEAR account has access to repositories there? (I did this with my >> Google Code projects before moving to GitHub). >> >> Finally, I know Chris and the guys at GitHub well enough to be a liaison if >> needed. >> >> Love, love, love this idea. Love. <3 and such. >> >> --Joe >> >> On Jun 23, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Travis Swicegood wrote: >> >>> Funny you should mention Git. >>> >>> For those of you following the SVN migration for php-src, you'll have seen >>> Rasmus' idea of moving php-src to GitHub.  We're working on setting up a >>> playground on GitHub to experiment.  There's a ton of pluses going this >>> route.  Some are Git specific, some are specific to GitHub: >>> >>> * Fully distributed - now people can commit at conferences when wifi is >>> down!  -- I'm looking at you David Coallier. :-) (git) >>> * Globally distributed back-ups.  Each developer has a full copy of the >>> repositories history. (git) >>> * We're letting people who dig managing VCS servers manage ours instead of >>> us tinkering with it. (GitHub) >>> * Really easy, no software required patch submission.  You can edit a file >>> directly on github.com.  (GitHub) >>> * Seamlessly enables the incubator/sandbox model coupled with official >>> releases that we've talked about for pear2.  Want to start a new package? >>> Create a project on GitHub and let pear-dev@ know about it, then propose >>> creating an official repo for it once it's ready to go beta. >>> >>> We'll have a playground up in a few days for everyone to play with.  I >>> should stress that at this point we're still just toying with the idea. >>>  There seems to be a movement afoot in php-src to move to Git in the >>> long-term, so this could be a good opportunity for PEAR to blaze the path. >>> :-) >>> >>> -T >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 22, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Kazuyoshi Tlacaelel wrote: >>> >>>> This is great, I think this is great, this is great! >>>> >>>> Joshua has been providing a very reliable svn server for the >>>> pear-community thanks Joshua! >>>> am really happy, about this. and really want to see pear running on svn. >>>> (at least) >>>> or git (as a must) >>>> >>>> Trully I think we should draw a milestone/deadline >>>> and announce it on the pear site, for the next scm big change! >>>> >>>> and have everybody migrate according to that! >>>> >>>> This is really nice! >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2009/06/23, at 11:07, Greg Beaver wrote: >>>> >>>>> Alan Knowles wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Are we still keeping CVS?, I'd rather keep using it for my packages. >>>>>> I use svn mounted dav  for development locally, and commit them into >>>>>> CVS >>>>>> (unfortunatly it does not work with SVN to SVN commits). >>>>>> >>>>>> I dont mind deleting the svn code and putting a place holder to 'see >>>>>> cvs.php.net' in the folder? >>>>> >>>>> Hi Alan, >>>>> >>>>> cvs.php.net is actually being shut down (unless my understanding is off) >>>>> and replaced with svn.php.net >>>>> >>>>> Greg >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) >>>>> To unsubscribe, visit: >>>>> http://www.php.net/unsub.php >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) >>>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >>>> >> >> >> -- >> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >

« previous php.pear.dev (#52034) next »