Re: Re: Keeping CVS? was - Re: [PEAR-DEV] CVS 2 SVN

From: Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:26:25 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Keeping CVS? was - Re: [PEAR-DEV] CVS 2 SVN
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-52219@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Jun 25, 2009, at 9:18 AM, till wrote:
I think this is an argument against it. Distributed VCS is cool, but distributed bug tracking and documentation? I see that Github will "probably not disappear tomorrow, but integrating the above into the PEAR QA process will be hellish.
Can you explain how? Each PEAR package would be under the pear (or pear2) username so all the bugs would be centralized to that package/user. My understanding of how this *might* work would be: 1. I propose a package. 2. It's approved. 3. The pear user creates a package on GitHub and makes me a contributor. 4. Wiki/Bugs are grouped into that package under the pear username. Also, GitHub has a pretty nice API. No reason we couldn't build tools for QA to harvest and show this information in an easier format. I'm not saying your point is invalid (I've never done PEAR-QA stuff). Just curious for more info. :) --Joe

« previous php.pear.dev (#52219) next »