Re: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_BrowserMob

With that in mind, we need to look through all packages are are currently released under the PHP License, contact their lead developers and, with them, determine what ought to be done with them. Ken. 2010/5/29 Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson <helgith@gmail.com>: > On 27 May 2010, at 17:28, Michael Gauthier wrote: > >> >> I also agree with the licensing concerns. BSD, MIT or LGPL license should >> be use instead if possible. The PHP license is really targeted towards >> PHP's source code and is not great for PHP user-space code. > > I would like to point out that the PEAR group disallowed the PHP license on new packages a year > or two ago. Will dig up the link and such when I get proper internet. > Before anyone starts asking why that was done, Michael answered that here above. It basically > makes it hard for debian and similar distros to package up those packages and as a proxy any product > using that code. > > - Helgi > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/