Re: phpDocumentor2 vs. PEAR2_PHPDocumentor (which name should we choose)

From: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:34:45 +0000
Subject: Re: phpDocumentor2 vs. PEAR2_PHPDocumentor (which name should we choose)
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-53564@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Brett Bieber <brett.bieber@gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Shawn Stratton <sstratton@php.net> wrote: > > I've had the pleasure of seeing the name discussed a few times already > > and as such would like to find out once and for all which name is > > preferred before James and I dig too far and get too stuck to one name > > or the other. As such I'd like to ask for a vote of what the package > > name should be. I'll tally up what everyone thinks and James and I > > will stick with that. > > PEAR2 standards require namespace prefix of PEAR2. The standards also > state that acronyms should be capitalized, eg PHP. > http://wiki.php.net/pear/rfc/pear2_standards > > -- > Brett Bieber > I'm inclined to agree with Brett, to make it a PEAR2 app and follow the PEAR2 naming convention of \PEAR2\PHPDocumentor... -- CRB

« previous php.pear.dev (#53564) next »