Re: phpDocumentor2 vs. PEAR2_PHPDocumentor (which name should we choose)
| From: | Shawn Stratton | Date: | Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:35:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: phpDocumentor2 vs. PEAR2_PHPDocumentor (which name should we choose) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-53565@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Done and taken care of, will do the code changes as of tonight,
PEAR2\PHPDocumentor
Shawn Stratton
Zend Certified Engineer
PEAR2\PHPDocumentor Developer
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Brett Bieber <brett.bieber@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Shawn Stratton <sstratton@php.net> wrote:
>> > I've had the pleasure of seeing the name discussed a few times already
>> > and as such would like to find out once and for all which name is
>> > preferred before James and I dig too far and get too stuck to one name
>> > or the other. As such I'd like to ask for a vote of what the package
>> > name should be. I'll tally up what everyone thinks and James and I
>> > will stick with that.
>>
>> PEAR2 standards require namespace prefix of PEAR2. The standards also
>> state that acronyms should be capitalized, eg PHP.
>> http://wiki.php.net/pear/rfc/pear2_standards
>>
>> --
>> Brett Bieber
>
>
> I'm inclined to agree with Brett, to make it a PEAR2 app and follow the
> PEAR2 naming convention of \PEAR2\PHPDocumentor...
> --
> CRB
>