Re: PEAR group elections - 2011?

On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 07:53:37PM +0200, Bertrand Mansion wrote: > But in my opinion, at the moment it's too difficult to submit a new package. > By difficult, I mean it is time consuming and involves a lot of bureaucracy > and a lot of prior knowledge of the process. There is also too much Yes - I can vouch for that. I have tried to raise some interest in a new package, a smarty renderer for quickform2 (there is one for quickform - version 1). I followed, as far as I could tell, the rules - put up a proposal and was almost completely ignored. The comments that I have received have been supportive, but I have a feeling that most people are apathetic. http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=653 It works, I have been using it for over a year - one or two others have as well. What do I do to progress this ? > confusion about what is Pyrus (never heard of that), Phar, PEAR 1, PEAR 2, > Pear package manager, PHP5 support, Namespace support, PEAR Exception, PEAR > Error, etc, etc. Personally, if I had to contribute a new PEAR package > today, I wouldn't know where to start. So if you could simplify the process Yes - it was not easy and I don't really know if I have got it right. -- Alain Williams Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer. +44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/ Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php #include <std_disclaimer.h>