Re: PHPDoc renderer not working

Jesus, Just for curiosity: I tried about 3 times to generate documentation for 3 files and never get it to work. =) We are just trying to continue Ulf's work and release something stable (yeah, it's beta yet). We have a lot of improvements to make. And I didn't know about this other project, that seems a brother of PHPDoc (maybe a clone). Why don't merge both works and make an "Official" PHPDoc engine using all our skills and time ? What do you all think about that? =) On Sat, 2002-04-27 at 21:48, Jesus M. Castagnetto wrote: > You might want to take a look at phpdocu.sourceforge.net > > In (informal) tests running PHPDoc (using the web interface, which works OK > btw), and phpdocu (command line interface). The second one was faster, mainly > because it did not generate intermediate XML files. > > When running PHPDoc on pear/Math_Vector (local version, with several > modifications, like addition of unit tests and more examples), I had to stop > the run after 2.5 hours (yes *hours*). In contrast phpdocu took 46 seconds to > produce the documentation. > > The second documentation tool, has its quirks, but on the other hand allows > documentation to be associated w/ packages, functions, define(), etc. And seems > to be OK w/ tags like: > > @see NameOfOtherClass > > which PHPDoc reports as incorrect, even though it is correct according to > JavaDoc specs. I like PHPDoc, it is more complete than phpdocu, but if I have > to wait for hours vs seconds, then guess what will be the tool that I will use > on a day to day basis. -- Cya +++ Antonio CVS .: organiKa :. "We use only recicled bits" floripa@organiKa.com.br http://www.organiKa.com.br Key fingerprint = 9F5B 31B0 C52A 4C4D 3A37 3A9F 7304 2779 5BBE B073

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] This is a digitally signed message part signature.asc