Re: Validation class comments

From: Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 21:29:07 +0000
Subject: Re: Validation class comments
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-6549@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
How about creating some methods for javascript output so one could use the same class interface for both client side, and server side validation? my two cents worth. -timmyg At 11:27 PM 5/28/2002 +0200, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
On 28 May 2002 20:55:34 +0200 "Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com> wrote: I'm talking about performance not easy of use :-) As usual, hard to make compromises between modularity and performances. Basically, the core validation should contain the following : Basic types : string email (optional MX check (calls network container) ) reserved words ( must have words[] ) regexp min length max length commonly used algos ( string algo stuffs like a std checksum with key incuded ) url's others ? numeric interval [min,max] precision (decimal) commonly used algos (luhn, ... ) And the 2nd level we would find :) :
. . .

« previous php.pear.dev (#6549) next »